
Deleuze, commenting on the philosophy of Henri Bergson, dismisses the conception of cinema as a succession of still photographs. Instead, he argues that what cinema gives us is movement-image (p2). Figures are not described in motion; rather, the continuity of movement describes the figure (p5). In this respect, cinema embodies a modern conception of movement, “capable of thinking the production of the new” (p7), as opposed to the ancient conception of movement as a succession of separate elements, exemplified by Zeno’s arrow.

August 5th, 2008 - 1:10 pm
line and surface
August 5th, 2008 - 1:19 pm
ali madad